Most people are in awe of physicians. Medical doctors are smart, well educated, and
devote their working lives to helping others.
The least we can do, it would seem, is not to add unnecessary
complication to their already-overstressed schedules by disagreeing with them. The current New England Journal of Medicine has an important article, “SpeakingUp — When Doctors Navigate Medical Hierarchy,” by Ranjana Srivastava of the
Monash Medical Center in Australia.
It turns out that not only patients are
intimidated by physicians; doctors are also intimidated by other doctors so
that they do not always speak up when they sense that something is wrong. Medical professionals are especially loath to
interrogate those whom they perceive as outranking them in the medical
profession’s pecking order. Srivastava,
an oncologist, was unwilling to express her sense of uneasiness about a patient
to the surgeon about to operate on him.
Her account of the incident and its consequences is honest and moving.
The message I took away from this article is
this: if something bothers you, speak up. Be respectful, ask reasonable questions, but don’t
keep silent. To this I would add: if the doctor becomes annoyed or brushes your
reservations aside, get a second opinion.
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Sunday, January 20, 2013
Abdominal Migraines
My paternal grandmother would sometimes get abdominal
pain severe enough to send her to the emergency room. She had a number of exploratory surgeries
that turned up nothing until finally, in her seventies or eighties, she said, “No
more surgeries.” My father used to get
migraine headaches. I don’t get those,
but once in a great while (about every seven years) I get an abdominal
migraine. Usually at night after a big
meal, maybe under stressful circumstances, I will get painful spasms below my
navel (about 7 on a scale of 1 to 10), accompanied by sweating, vomiting, and
diarrhea until my whole system is cleared out.
After that the pain continues; I can’t keep down any food or liquid; and
of course I can’t sleep.
In 1989 that happened and I went to the emergency
room. That time I was lucky because the
doctor there knew what this was. He
checked a few things, had an x-ray taken, and sent me home with pain
medication. He didn’t tell me the name
of the condition; I found that out later for myself. I stayed in bed the next day and after that I
was fine. Seven years later it happened
again and I called my regular doctor. I
said, “I know what this is. Please give
me something for the pain and I’ll be OK in a day or two.” My doctor was skeptical and wanted to be
extra cautious. She had me check into
the hospital and lined up a surgeon. The hospital ran various tests, found
nothing, and let me go after a couple of days.
The next time, just as the pain was starting, I took a generic Pepcid AC
(famotidine) and the pain stopped in its tracks: apparently this is the right
thing to do.
Many doctors believe that only children get abdominal
migraines but this seems to be wrong. I
get them, my grandmother probably did too, and I know at least one other adult
who does. In adults an abdominal
migraine is probably mistaken for a stomach virus or food poisoning. For people who get them often it probably
makes sense to carry the pills around, just in case.
I get various kinds of muscle spasms too. The best fix for these is to wet a washcloth
with the hottest water you can stand and press it against the knotted up
area. Sometimes this has to be done a
couple of times but after that the muscle will relax. I’ve read that muscle spasms can be caused by
deficiencies in any of various minerals.
I take potassium, magnesium, and calcium and the blood tests for these
indicate that I’m where I should be.
Evidently this is just part of my genetic inheritance.
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
The Latest on Stilbestrol
In today’s paper I read about the Melnick sisters, whose
suit against Eli Lilly and Company went to trial this week. The sisters charge that a Lilly product,
diethylstilbestrol (DES), which was given to their mother during four of her
pregnancies, caused their breast cancers.
DES was given to pregnant women in the 1940’s and 50’s to prevent miscarriage. It was later taken off the market when it was
found to cause a rare type of vaginal cancer in the daughters of women who had
taken the medication. It was also found
not to prevent miscarriage.
The circumstantial aspects of the Melnick case are
compelling. Four of the daughters
developed breast cancer in their forties after their mother took DES during
those pregnancies. A fifth daughter, who
did not receive in utero exposure to
the drug, has not had cancer. On the
other hand, the pregnancies took place during the 1950’s; medical records no
longer exist; and Lilly was not the only company that produced
stilbestrol. In addition, the
prescribing doctor failed to follow Lilly’s recommendations, which called for
using the drug after three or more consecutive miscarriages. The Melnicks’ mother evidently did not have
successive miscarriages.
In “Stilbestrol and Me” I discussed my own experience
with DES. My mother’s doctor prescribed
the drug after my would-have-been older brother was born a “blue baby” and died
soon after, not really a miscarriage at all but a heart problem in the
child. DES is a good illustration of “The
Twenty Year Rule.” An apparently
successful new technology appears; the medical profession gets excited and
applies it to many patients. Twenty
years later (from the ‘50s to the ‘70s in the case of DES) unpleasant or
dangerous side effects become evident and the medical profession backs off en masse. You would think these experiences would lead
all of us to be more cautious before trying out the latest thing on our
irreplaceable bodies.
Update 1/10/2013: Eli LIlly settled its case with the Melnick sisters for an undisclosed amount. Lilly stated that, while it did not believe that its medication had caused the Melnicks' illnesses, the settlement was in its best interest.
Update 1/10/2013: Eli LIlly settled its case with the Melnick sisters for an undisclosed amount. Lilly stated that, while it did not believe that its medication had caused the Melnicks' illnesses, the settlement was in its best interest.
Thursday, January 3, 2013
“Dear CDC: BMI ≠ Body Fat”
Happy New Year! Another year, another study apparently proving
that being a little overweight is fine and may even reduce your risk of dying,
as compared with being thinner. This
one, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, re-analyzes data from
97 studies involving nearly three million people from various countries. The study, which is being published in the Journal of the American Medical Association,
has been widely publicized. I counted
two articles in the New York Times
and one in the Wall Street Journal
plus coverage on radio, TV, and the Internet.
This is the most recent illustration of “the
obesity paradox,” the fact that, although excess weight is a factor in cardiovascular
disease, obese patients with heart disease tend to live longer than those with
no excess weight. I would argue that the
root of this “paradox” is in the definition of obesity. When you used a flawed measuring device, you
get incorrect results and BMI, which used as the index of fitness in all these
studies, is seriously flawed, as I explained in my post, “What’s Wrong With BMI.”
BMI is a ratio of weight to height: multiply your weight in pounds by 4.88, then
divide it by your height in inches, squared.
Anyone with a BMI over 25 is considered overweight; anyone over 30 is classified
as obese. This means that people who are
fatter than average (unhealthy) are lumped together with people who are more
muscular than average (very healthy). Under
this system, a person the same height and weight as Tony Horton would be
treated as equally fit even if he had never exercised a day in his life! Measuring the percentage of body fat for each
individual would provide a more accurate picture of the situation. Lots of people know that there are problems
with BMI. Melinda Beck’s article in the WSJ alludes to this. A number of her readers know it too, as
indicated by some of the comments on the article. So why did the CDC use it in this case? The
answer is that it is easier and cheaper to use existing data and the existing
data all use BMI.
As a federal agency under the Department of Health and Human Services, the CDC is looked upon as a leader in the fields of science and health. When it continues to use and endorse BMI as a measure of good physical condition, it sets an example that others follow, which does a disservice to all of us. In my doctor’s office my weight is measured on a BMI scale. I ask my doctor why there is no body fat scale and she says that BMI is the current standard. As long as this continues, there will be no data on body fat for anyone to study unless they do original studies themselves. Fortunately, some of this research is being done. A Mayo clinic study found that people of normal weight can be at greater risk of heart disease if the levels of body fat are high.
The timing of this new study and the ensuing
publicity could hardly be more damaging.
Scientists at the CDC are surely aware that fat people who lose weight
through appropriate diet and exercise (not illness) will lower their blood pressure,
reduce their blood sugar, and improve their cholesterol readings, all of which
will contribute to better health. At the
beginning of a new year many people are pre-disposed to turn over a new
leaf. Instead of encouraging people to
cultivate better habits, the CDC puts its imprimatur on the perverse message
that it’s OK to be fat.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)