I was brought up in a family with Anglo values; we children were encouraged to be brave and ignore minor aches and pains. I now believe that, except for endurance athletes and soldiers on the battlefield, this is not good advice. Pain is your nervous system telling you that something may be wrong.
People who are serious about fitness become connoisseurs of pain. There is the muscle soreness that lets you know that you’re actually challenging the muscle and making it stronger; there are the nasty little twinges when you’re pulled a tendon a little too much; the more ominous, raw sensation of a sprain; and so on. Noticing these and applying a remedy if it is needed are part of treating your body with respect. Sore muscles can be stretched or massaged with a foam roller. Pulled tendons and sprains can be treated with heat and ice.
When a little pain is ignored it can turn into a serious problem. I have thin skin, literally; the corneas of my eyes are thin too. In winter I will often get a little cut or nick on my hand. If I put a band-aid and antiseptic on it right away, it heals quickly. If I don’t, it will turn into a persistent sore painful enough to keep me awake at night. When I was about thirty I used to get a creepy little pain in my lower back, no big deal; I never went to a doctor about it. I now believe that this was when my reproductive system was beginning to self-destruct.
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Strength Ball Training
These days a lot of interesting work on health and fitness
is being done in Canada. Strength Ball Training, by Lorne
Goldenberg and Peter Twist, builds on this work. I started using SBT a couple of years ago when I was no longer making progress with
my workout at the time, a challenging program involving fairly heavy weights,
stretching, and aerobic exercise. I
especially wanted to work on my core, which had been helped, but not completely
shaped up, by ab machines at the Y.
(This was before I knew about Ab Ripper X.)
The exercises in this book employ stability balls, medicine
balls, weights, and occasionally weight machines. The program particularly emphasizes core work
and balance but all major body parts are covered. Because of the element of instability introduced
by the ball the exercises get into little in-between areas that weights and
weight machines don’t touch. On a recent
trip to Vancouver I visited Twist, an exercise facility owned by Peter
Twist. Its main clientele is hockey
players so the emphasis on core work and balance makes sense.
What first impressed me about SBT was the quality, the amount of care that has gone into every
aspect of the book and the accompanying DVD.
The introduction explains the approach and cites recent research. The
instructions and photo accompanying each exercise are clear and helpful and the
beautifully produced DVD demonstrates proper form for many, though not all, of
the exercises.
Exercises are arranged in categories depending on the part of the body being worked and a sixteen week program is included in the back.
Exercises are arranged in categories depending on the part of the body being worked and a sixteen week program is included in the back.
When I started using SBT,
I tried the sixteen-week program and saw dramatic changes not only in my core
but also in my upper arms and legs. I'm
now following the same pattern, selecting eight or more exercises from
different parts of the book and changing the selection every four weeks. The instructions for each exercise have
advice about progressions, so the possibilities are really endless. Some
strength training programs are illustrated with photos of people who look like
the Michelin Man. The people in this book look like regular people in very good
shape. That's how I want to look.
Saturday, October 8, 2011
My Possessions
In his book The
Feeling of What Happens neuroscientist Antonio Damasio makes the
interesting point that each of us has one and only one body. I believe that the only things I truly own
are my physical body and my time. I do
not own another person (and Sadie Pearl the cat would be the first to tell you
that I don’t own her either). The books, clothes, and other stuff that I normally
think of as belonging to me will be mine only while I am here to use them. When I came into this world, small and naked, I
had only my body and my time and those will be mine until I leave it.
Stretching
When I was in elementary school we lived next to a library and
I would often go to look around at the books and pictures that were there. One day I found a book with pictures of a
thin, brown-skinned man bending and twisting his body in extraordinary ways, an
exotic sight to my 1950’s-little-kid eyes.
My mother told me that that was yoga.
Fast forward forty years.
I am lying on my back in savasana
(“Corpse Pose”) on the floor of a large high-ceilinged room in a commercial building
in downtown Bloomington, Indiana.
Sunlight streams in on the worn and faded colors of Oriental rugs that
carpet the floor. A tape of Enya plays
softly in the background. I
re-discovered yoga in my early forties as a respite from the rush and stress of
a busy real estate career and for years I went to classes several times a
week. Some yoga practitioners believe
that yoga is the only exercise you need.
For me, cardio and weight-lifting turned out to be essential so there
was no more time for yoga classes
Breathing is one of the central concerns of hatha yoga, the
inward, invigorating inhalation and the relaxing exhalation, which is often
twice as long in breathing exercises. When
I was in my thirties I was always trying to do things more quickly, to make my
body go as fast as my thoughts. In my
forties I discovered that relaxing, letting go, was the essential other side of
the coin, to slow the thoughts down to the pace of the body.
I don’t go to yoga classes but I’ve incorporated some good
yoga habits into my life. If I’m in
heavy traffic I try to pay attention to my breathing and make the exhale twice
as long as the inhale. When I got frozen
shoulder, yoga stretches helped bring it back to normal. And, in the evenings after I’ve done a heavy
workout, I stretch, usually the resistance stretching I learned from Anne Tierney and Steve Sierra, a system similar to yoga.
Some recent studies seem to cast doubt on the benefits of
stretching. Athletes used to be told to
stretch before and after exercise to improve performance and prevent injuries. Acute stretching immediately before exercise
actually diminishes performance in some tasks.
Some researchers also question whether stretching has any effect on exercise related injuries.
If exercise doesn’t improve performance or prevent injury why
bother? Because exercise improves flexibility and helps you to relax. When you do strenuous exercise you break the body
down a little so it will build itself up stronger. The rebuilding process comes when you rest. When I’m trying to sleep I sometimes use a
yoga technique: I slow my mind down
enough so I can feel the little pulses in the tips of my fingers and just pay
attention to those…
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Statistics and the Twenty Year Rule: Why the Old Standbys May Be Safer Than Newly Approved Drugs
For much of my adult life, twenty-five years, I had the same doctor. She was a fine internist who took wonderful care of me whenever there was a crisis but we had our differences. In 2000, when my cholesterol was high, she wanted me to take a statin. Instead, I opted for changes in diet and exercise. A couple of years later when a DEXA showed osteopenia, low bone density, she urged me to take a bisphosphonate. I said “No, thanks.” to that too and increased my intake of calcium and vitamin D.
As I told my doctor, my resistance to taking new medications has partly to do with my medical history. In the mid 1940’s when she was pregnant with me my mother took diethylstilbestrol (DES), which was thought at the time to prevent miscarriages. By the 1970’s DES was found to be associated with an increased risk of cancer in girls prenatally exposed to it. In 1978 after I had a complete hysterectomy my doctor at the time said, “Take estrogen or you will get osteoporosis.” So I took estrogen. In 2002 a large Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study associated hormone replacement therapy with an increased risk of heart disease, stroke, and breast cancer. If I started taking statins in 2000 at the age of 54, I reasoned, new research in the 2020’s would show why that had been a bad idea. By then I would be in my 70’s and I would not be amused.
How can a person weigh and evaluate the benefits and risks associated with various options? An excellent article in the September 24-25 Wall Street Journal addresses that very topic. In “Designing a Smarter Patient,” Drs. Jerome Groopman and Pamela Hartzband discuss ways to help a patient make wise decisions about whether or not to accept particular treatments. A patient is told that a particular statin will reduce her risk of a heart attack by 30%, which sounds impressive. Then she goes to a government-sponsored web site and calculates her risk of getting a heart attack, which turns out to be 1%. So taking the statin will lower her risk from 1% to .67%, not much of a benefit considering the monetary cost and possibility of side effects.
In my case, the Cleveland Clinic’s Stroke Risk Calculator indicates that my 10-year risk of a stroke is 3%. Based on the WHI study, my increased risk of a stroke because of taking estrogen is .00012 (12 in 10,000 additional strokes), increasing my overall risk to 3.0036. I’m going to keep taking the estrogen to protect my bones.
New medications come on the market constantly. A recent study showed that many Americans believe that drugs approved by the FDA are “extremely effective” and have no serious side effects. In fact, FDA approval only means that the benefits outweigh the risks, based on the research that has been done up to that point. There may be products already on the market that are more effective and safer. The risks (and benefits) of the new drug may not show up for years until a larger population of patients has tried them.
As I told my doctor, my resistance to taking new medications has partly to do with my medical history. In the mid 1940’s when she was pregnant with me my mother took diethylstilbestrol (DES), which was thought at the time to prevent miscarriages. By the 1970’s DES was found to be associated with an increased risk of cancer in girls prenatally exposed to it. In 1978 after I had a complete hysterectomy my doctor at the time said, “Take estrogen or you will get osteoporosis.” So I took estrogen. In 2002 a large Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study associated hormone replacement therapy with an increased risk of heart disease, stroke, and breast cancer. If I started taking statins in 2000 at the age of 54, I reasoned, new research in the 2020’s would show why that had been a bad idea. By then I would be in my 70’s and I would not be amused.
How can a person weigh and evaluate the benefits and risks associated with various options? An excellent article in the September 24-25 Wall Street Journal addresses that very topic. In “Designing a Smarter Patient,” Drs. Jerome Groopman and Pamela Hartzband discuss ways to help a patient make wise decisions about whether or not to accept particular treatments. A patient is told that a particular statin will reduce her risk of a heart attack by 30%, which sounds impressive. Then she goes to a government-sponsored web site and calculates her risk of getting a heart attack, which turns out to be 1%. So taking the statin will lower her risk from 1% to .67%, not much of a benefit considering the monetary cost and possibility of side effects.
In my case, the Cleveland Clinic’s Stroke Risk Calculator indicates that my 10-year risk of a stroke is 3%. Based on the WHI study, my increased risk of a stroke because of taking estrogen is .00012 (12 in 10,000 additional strokes), increasing my overall risk to 3.0036. I’m going to keep taking the estrogen to protect my bones.
New medications come on the market constantly. A recent study showed that many Americans believe that drugs approved by the FDA are “extremely effective” and have no serious side effects. In fact, FDA approval only means that the benefits outweigh the risks, based on the research that has been done up to that point. There may be products already on the market that are more effective and safer. The risks (and benefits) of the new drug may not show up for years until a larger population of patients has tried them.
Should I Be Taking This? 3
BONIVA can cause serious side effects including problems with the esophagus,
low blood calcium, bone, joint or muscle pain, severe jaw bone problems, and
unusual thigh bone fractures.
Before starting BONIVA, tell your doctor if you have problems with swallowing, stomach or digestive problems, have low blood calcium, plan to have dental surgery or teeth removed or have kidney problems
Stop taking BONIVA and tell your doctor right away if you have pain or trouble swallowing, chest pain, or severe or continuing heartburn, as these may be signs of serious upper digestive problems. Call your doctor immediately if jaw problems, hip, groin, or thigh pain develop, or if you have symptoms of low blood calcium such as spasms, twitching, cramps in your muscles, or numbness or tingling in your fingers, toes, or around your mouth.
Before starting BONIVA, tell your doctor if you have problems with swallowing, stomach or digestive problems, have low blood calcium, plan to have dental surgery or teeth removed or have kidney problems
Stop taking BONIVA and tell your doctor right away if you have pain or trouble swallowing, chest pain, or severe or continuing heartburn, as these may be signs of serious upper digestive problems. Call your doctor immediately if jaw problems, hip, groin, or thigh pain develop, or if you have symptoms of low blood calcium such as spasms, twitching, cramps in your muscles, or numbness or tingling in your fingers, toes, or around your mouth.
BONIVA is a prescription medicine used to treat or prevent
osteoporosis in women after menopause. BONIVA helps increase bone mass and
helps reduce the chance of having a spinal fracture (break).
Saturday, October 1, 2011
Respect the Feet
Feet are the Rodney Dangerfield of the human anatomy; their
health tends to be ignored until there’s a crisis, like diabetes or advanced
arthritis. I was lucky enough to get
started earlier in the cycle. I could
never have reached my present level of fitness if I hadn’t had my feet fixed.
In my post, "An Unfashionable Body", I talked about how I seem to have inherited my paternal grandmother's physique. In old age my grandmother had terrible trouble with her left knee and had to have cortisone shots to deal with the pain. I suspect this was because she had the same short right leg; the left knee got crunched together for all the decades of her life, including five pregnancies, and nobody ever spotted the real problem.
In 1994 I had started walking around the track at the Y and
I noticed little pains on the sides of my feet.
When Dr. Hoffman first looked at them he said, “These are
pretty good feet but they’ll stay good longer if you get orthotics and wear
them.” “That’s for me,” I said, and began
a relationship that has been long, successful, and slightly weird. Casts were made of my feet and were sent away
to the orthotics-works. A pair of
plastic inserts came back and I started to wear them. Dr. Hoffman said, “If you feel any pain, come
back.”
Things went along pretty well until about 2000 when I
started exercising more and spending hours working in a darkroom with a cement
floor. During this period I noticed a
very painful spot at the back of my right hip. I went back to Dr. Hoffman and he adjusted my orthotics by filing down
the plastic or gluing on little pieces of cork. He said, “If it’s not right, come back.” We repeated this process many, many times; the pain just wasn’t going
away. I started experimenting myself,
taping on little bits of cardboard to the orthotics to see what would
help. Usually I ended up with cardboards
taped to the orthotic on the right side rather than the left.
Finally, Dr. Hoffman identified the source of the
problem: my right leg is about ¼”
shorter than the left. When you’re young, you
easily compensate for such minor asymmetries. As you get older, especially with the exercise I was doing, a little
flaw can mean big trouble. Dr. Hoffman
built up the orthotic on the right side and the pain went away.
In my post, "An Unfashionable Body", I talked about how I seem to have inherited my paternal grandmother's physique. In old age my grandmother had terrible trouble with her left knee and had to have cortisone shots to deal with the pain. I suspect this was because she had the same short right leg; the left knee got crunched together for all the decades of her life, including five pregnancies, and nobody ever spotted the real problem.
I still get pains in my feet sometimes. Oddly, they usually come not when I’m walking
around but in the evening when I’m lying in bed. These days it’s likely to be a consistent
dull ache in some small spot. When that
happens I try taping cardboard pieces to the corresponding spot on the
insert. Sometimes the lumps of cardboard
get pretty big. When I think I’ve got it
right, or when the “edits” have gotten way too complicated, I take the orthotic
in to Dr. Hoffman and he laughs. Then in
three or four minutes he comes up with a rational solution, taking away the
cardboards, filing, and gluing on cork. It’s a good thing he’s patient and has a sense of humor.
This experience has taught me that foot problems can cause
knee, hip, and back pain. If that pain
goes on for a long period it will damage or destroy the affected bones. I wonder how many knee and hip replacements
could have been headed off if the underlying foot problems had been corrected
in time. Note to insurers, legislators,
and anyone else wanting to cut health care costs: recommend that everyone over forty have their
feet checked by a podiatrist at least once.
The pictures below show my orthotics, top and bottom. The right side has “edits” by Dr. Hoffman and
by me.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)